Finance Study Names Top Lenders

Finance Study Names Top Lenders

Critical Shifts:

  • Operational Ease Beats Rates: Approval speed, smooth workflows, and strong sales relationships drive 70% of lender selection, while competitive rates account for just 18%.

  • Consistency Drives Satisfaction: Satisfaction nearly quadruples (to 967/1,000) when lenders provide predictable answers, while failing to resolve issues on the first contact causes satisfaction to plunge 242 points.

  • Dealers Demand Self-Service: 74% of dealers prefer self-service tools, placing a high priority on real-time capabilities to restructure applications and clear issues without phone calls.

________________________________________________

Faster decisions, consistent answers, self-service tools and getting contracts funded right the first time are increasingly shaping which lenders dealers want to do business with, according to the JD Power 2026 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study. 

“Dealership finance professionals are telling lenders that the experience matters just as much, if not more, than the financial terms,” said Patrick Roosenberg, senior director of automotive finance intelligence at JD Power. “They want faster, more consistent decisions, the ability to handle more of the process themselves and issues resolved the first time. Lenders that can remove those points of friction have a better opportunity to earn more of a dealership’s business.”

Following are some key findings of the 2026 study:

  • Dealer finance professionals care about more than the rate: While a competitive rate is the most common reason dealer finance professionals send business to a lender (18%), factors such as ease, speed of approvals and sales representative relationships collectively account for 70% of the reasons dealers choose a lender. Consistency in lending decisions also matters: Overall satisfaction nearly quadruples to 967 (on a 1,000-point scale) when dealers experience consistent decisions from a lender. Dealers want to know that the same deal will get the same answer, regardless of which analyst reviews it.
  • Getting it right the first time matters: In this year’s study, lender staff resolved 82% of dealers’ problems, questions or issues on the first contact. The overall satisfaction score for lenders that deliver first-contact resolution is 841, compared to 599 when a second contact is needed (-242 points). Nearly 20% of interactions require a second contact. 
  • Dealers increasingly want to handle financing themselves: Almost three-fourths (74%) of dealers want to mostly or fully self-serve, with restructuring credit applications as the top task they want to manage on their own. This points to growing demand for real-time tools that let dealers make changes, clear issues and restructure deals without having to call the lender.

Study Rankings

  • Captive Premium

Jaguar Land Rover Financial Group ranks highest in overall dealer satisfaction with a score of 879, followed by Porsche Financial Services (853) and Maserati Capital USA (844).

  • Captive Mass Market

Subaru Motors Finance ranks highest in overall dealer satisfaction with a score of 879, followed by Southeast Toyota Finance (871) and Toyota Financial Services (813).

  • Non-Captive National—Prime

TD Auto Finance ranks highest in overall dealer satisfaction for a seventh consecutive year, with a score of 895, followed by Capital One Auto Finance (871) and Ally Financial (868).

  • Non-Captive Regional—Prime

Huntington National Bank ranks highest in overall dealer satisfaction for a fourth consecutive year, with a score of 794, followed by Fifth Third Bank (748).

  • Non-Captive Sub-Prime

Capital One Auto Finance ranks highest in overall dealer satisfaction, with a score of 864, followed by Ally Financial (858) and Chase Auto (802).

The 2026 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study is based on 25,541 evaluations from 5,662 auto dealer financial professionals. The study, which was fielded from April through May 2026, measures auto dealer satisfaction in five segments of lenders: captive premium; captive mass market; non-captive national—prime; non-captive regional—prime; and non-captive sub-prime.